For the third consecutive year, Candler School of Theology has received a grant from International Relief and Development, Inc. (IRD) to send student interns to IRD service sites in several international locations this summer. Three Candler students and five students from Emory’s Rollins School of Public Health will be assessing a broad range of issues, including democracy and governance, HIV/AIDS, child poverty and mortality, and community development.
Colombia
Jonathan Navas, 2nd year MDiv student
Lisandro Torre, Rollins School of Public Health student
Since October 2008, IRD has provided direct humanitarian assistance, including food, safe drinking water, and household and hygiene supplies, to internally displaced persons (IDPs), who are the families of those killed or missing in the civil conflict with the drug regimes in Colombia. Jonathan and Lisandro are supporting the closing baseline survey for the past three years of this IRD humanitarian program.
Laos
Peggy Jean Craig, 3rd year MDiv student
Heather Reese, Rollins School of Public Health student
IRD Laos is currently implementing a Food for Education project and a Vision Screening project for children. Peggy Jean and Heather are developing project proposals in health (water and sanitation, maternal and child health, nutrition) and/or education, which involves basic community assessments, writing concept papers, and contacting potential donors. In addition, they will assist in the development of photo essays or video documentaries featuring project information and impact stories to share with the IRD audience.
Mozambique
Marques Harvey, 2nd year MDiv student
Lindsey Haeger, Rollins School of Public Health student
Marques and Lindsey are contributing to a baseline survey for the upcoming intervention on Malaria, which will be administered under the Global Fund for HIV, TB and Malaria. They also will visit target communities in the Inhambane and Sofala provinces of Mozambique and document stories about the impact Malaria has on these persons, the local economies, and the community.
Zimbabwe
Patrick Gallagher, Rollins School of Public Health student
Chantalle Okondo, Rollins School of Public Health student
In Zimbabwe, IRD implements the USAID-funded Restoring Livelihoods – Strengthening Value Chains (REVALUE) program. The primary focus of the REVALUE program is to increase incomes of 8,550 small holder farmers by developing commercially viable commodity value chains for groundnuts, sesame, sugar beans and paprika. The REVALUE program is currently being transitioned to the Zimbabwe Agricultural Incomes and Employment Development (Zim-AIED) program, under which IRD will continue the support to partnering farmers and will facilitate the access to credit for agri-businesses. Patrick and Chantalleare assessing the impact of income generated through the REVALUE and Zim-AIED programs to Orphans and Vulnerable Children (OVCs).
After weeks of weeding through surveys and doing data entry and analysis, I had been looking forward to finally travelling in Zimbabwe. My last weekend here me, Patrick and Danielle (another IRD intern) went to Great Zimbabwe, which is a UNESCO world heritage site and it’s known for being the largest best preserved stone wall city in Southern Africa.
on and initiative is certainly there! But, sometimes, the interactions seem artificial as one simply jots down or clicks away at the answer to a question. The surveys must be that way, though, so that there are numbers and figures for IRD to measure the quality of the work being done.Development, in all senses of the word, requires progression. Progression always entails a beginning and an end, a past and a future, as well as a stimulant that nurtures that growth. For International Relief & Development in Florencia, development is nurturing. Nurturing internally displaced persons and communities through health, education, and empowerment allows IRD to support families’ and communities’ progress from a bleak and anxiety-ridden past toward a more stabilized future. The growth IRD hopes to see in beneficiaries is not one divergent from one’s past—and one’s identity—but one moving beyond one’s former troubles by re-establishing oneself through nutritional, social, and political integration.
This past week I went to the nutritional recovery center for the last time to check in on a little girl that we referred there a couple of weeks ago. While the nurse was taking the information we needed, I saw that one of the babies was not in a crib, but in a basin on the floor lined with blankets. Her skin was splotchy and she had an intense look on her face and I went ahead and picked her up. After holding her for a few moments I noticed that her hands and feet were severely disfigured. Instead of palms her hands and feet were sort of like a V coming off of her ankles and wrists with two fingers at the ends. She can sort of stand, but will never walk normally (or possibly at all). I had never seen that and I asked the nurse what it was and whether it was genetic or a disease. The nurse told me that the disfigurement is caused by the chemicals that the government uses to fumigate to coca crops in the fight against drugs. The chemical gets into other crops and the water and there are apparently a lot of children with the same condition. I was thinking more about it and I am curious about what chemicals are used to fumigate the fields, who manufactures them and who pays for it. Mostly, I wonder if American anti-drug money is being used to buy these chemicals that are having such a negative effect on the population. When I thought about the situation and the chemicals being used, the image of the “Made in USA” label on the canisters of teargas that were used to quell the Egyptian riots flashed in my mind. It also highlights (in fact my whole experience in Tumaco highlights) how easily whole populations are affected and discarded byproducts in the war between the armed drug cartels and the military.
Yesterday the day started with the nutritionist at IRD asking if I wanted to go to the nutrition center. I said yes, thinking it would be great to see how Lady was progressing and see what was going on there. I knew that there was some tension between the center and IRD lately –a case had gone poorly (a baby girl had died) and there is an ongoing investigation and the center was getting a lot of heat and they thought it was because of IRD. I didn’t know we were going to the center to hash it out. We got there and received a frosty reception (though I did get to see Lady and she is back to a healthy weight and eating like a fiend) and were ignored for 20 minutes. Then we went into an office, sat in a mini circle while the doctor and three other employees at the center chewed us out for 20 minutes. I thought it would only be a couple of minutes, but he kept going and going and he told us about how the center’s name was being dragged through the mud and how a mother had heard they had killed a child and wasn’t letting them take her child and how the doctor was being personally investigated. It was awkward and all we could do was sit there. I had some idea of the background, but did not know that it had gotten so bad for them and they had every right to be upset. Then the nutritionist talked and told the IRD side and showed documentation showing that IRD had not done anything improper and how IRD had also documented from the start that the center had not done anything wrong (they never even saw the girl because they couldn’t – she had developmental issues that they are not prepared to handle so we could not even refer the child to them). He also promised to support them in the investigation and made everyone feel like things were going to be okay because IRD and the Center had done nothing wrong – there were just a lot of rumors floating around that needed to be cleared up. It was pretty amazing to see the situation go from toxic to good in the 20 minutes the nutritionist talked. I was impressed. It is also interesting to see how the two organizations worked together to fix the issue. There was a lot of talk about lessons learned from this experience and a discussion about how to improve the relationship to keep something like this from happening again. In the end, the whole situation will make the both organizations a little smarter and ready if something like this happens again.
It’s been three days since I’ve been back to the IRD office in Gnommalath town. I’m sticky with dried sweat and still a little groggy from waking up at 5am after going to sleep after midnight. But, we needed to have enough time to leave Talong village in Boulapa District and arrive in Hainoua village, Mahaxay District, before everyone went to the fields for the day.
The chief’s wife in Pah Panang village, Boualapa districtm clears away the dishes from dinner- steamed fish, fish soup, and sticky rice. Night has fallen while were eating, and community members have quietly slipped in during the meal to join us on the floor. Soukasien, the IRD Health Officer, and I are here to assess a small first aid program.